Skip to main content

Reflections on being with the kids

"I need my own time, my own career and goals, being with the kids all the time would bore me to tears and make me a dull person."

This was said, without any intent to be rude (!), by a mum I met at one of the playgroups.

Now, I've just spent over 3 weeks as the sole caregiver of my kids - literally I'm with them 24/7. Am I tired? You bet! Exhausted? Nearly. Frazzled? Exasperated? Often.

But bored? Hell no!

My children are a joy to be with, (mostly!) but more relevant to this question is that I see them. I see their personalities blossom a little further every day. I learn who they are, what they like and don't like, I guess you could say I study them! I am the top expert on them. I know them better than any living person in this world. And that isn't just because I happen to spend lots of time with them: it's because I have consciously made them my focus.

I haven't lost myself, or forgotten who I am. I have simply shifted my focus and my best efforts from my career, to my family. Sure, that was a choice. And it's an ongoing, daily choice. So my focus and interest is now on bringing them up well - that's dull and boring to many, and I'm totally ok with that! I'm equally bored with what many other people do for their careers, thanks very much Gary but I don't want to hear about how your high finance trades worked out this week.

I do wonder how many mothers are genuinely bored of their children, versus how many feel they "ought to be" because being at home all day with the rugrats is so looked down upon? But that's not for me to say. All I know is, my children are utterly fascinating to watch as they grow, and anything else I might do with my time (whilst outsourcing their upbringing to the cheapest available provider?) would bore me infinitely more.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Back to meat after 20 years vegan - 4 years on

Back in 2020, I briefly mentioned in another blog post that we were no longer vegan. I said that shift deserved its own blog post, but here we are at the end of 2024 and I never wrote that. Not that I intended to leave it this long, but it really did take me this long to truly digest the change (pardon the pun) and get enough distance from my previous world view that I could write about it. Paradigm shifts like that don't come quickly, or easily. I've had a few major paradigm shifts in my life - from atheist to Christian , and later to Catholicism - and it's a disorienting thing every time. It starts with the proverbial 'pebble in the shoe' (something niggling that gets harder and harder to ignore) and takes time to even go from subconscious to conscious mind, to a time of discovery and 'why didn't I see this before??', and finally a bewildering sense how I could possibly have thought the old way because I'm now wearing all-new lenses on life. The ...

Thrown into to a new reality, then back to the old

Towards the end of August this year, Mr. and I suddenly faced a very different future to the one we had envisioned: at 42 years old - and he's 55 - I found myself pregnant again. Camping after our summer trip - and I've just found out I'm pregnant As it's been seven years since D(7) was born, we really didn't expect that. We would have loved more kids soon after D, but I just never got pregnant. Seven years on, we were pretty convinced that this was our lot. Two beautiful children, we really can't complain! So we needed a bit of time to digest that. A new baby, with siblings 8 and nearly 10 years older! And Mr. would be 75 when that child was 20... the maths was mind boggling. But hey - if that was our new reality, we were going to run with it! The kids certainly were excited about it, they're old enough to understand and yes, we told them; this is a family matter. I knew there was a chance this pregnancy wouldn't work out, but we felt they had a right t...

Home Ed Questions: what about socialisation?

Last week, a reporter and cameraman from the BBC visited our house to do a feature about home education. It was great fun, a real adventure for the kids to be interviewed! The team spent 90 minutes at our house, but of course they had to condense that down to a couple of minutes for the feature, and sadly the kids' interviews didn't make the cut. (A transcript article of the feature is here ) I had put my hand up for doing this because the reporter had every intention to make this a positive piece on home education, and so it was; the premise was to try and answer why there had been such an uptick in home education in the past few years. They interviewed two mothers, probably strategically chosen: me as the one who always wanted to home educate, and the other mum as someone who felt she had to due to her son's needs.  They interviewed me at length, and of course only a few seconds of that made it to the screen, but inevitably it was the part to do with social skills that th...